MISSION

The mission of the Center is to participate with policymakers, education professionals, and other leaders in improving education within the Intermountain West. The goal of the Center is to influence critical decisions in management and public policy regarding education at all levels within the service area. The Center's purpose is to provide information and best practices for all critical areas of policy-making, administration, management, and governance of education facilities and groups.


The primary objectives of the Center are:

  • Provide state and local policymakers with objective, research-based information on education policy issues in the Intermountain area: Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wyoming.
  • To track state policy actions to identify emerging issues dealing with the ever changing scenery of public education from K-12 to higher education.
  • Provide responses to education entities at all levels with accurate, reliable data and research.

In our efforts to impact education through an informative discussion of issues, the Policy Center asks the following questions:

  • What are the leading policy issues in education in the intermountain area?
  • How are these policy issues being addressed now?
  • What could or should be done about them?
  • What trends, developments, and new research should policymakers, the public, and educators become knowledgeable about?

To accomplish the aforementioned objectives, the Center relies on the expertise of policy analysis in the intermountain area. Electronic resources, government documents, education research literature and specific policy studies are utilized to provide relevant policy information. This collaborative effort will involve state universities, agencies, and professional associations, as well as national resources where appropriate.

 

HISTORY 

1985-1990: The State Education Reform Movement

In the wake of A National at Risk, nearly every state undertook efforts to improve their quality of education. Many states raised standards for teachers and the criteria for high school education.

1990-1996: Policy and Finance Reform

In the first half of the 1990s, work focused on the emerging standards-based reform movement, on efforts to deregulate schooling and shift authority to the school level.

1996-2001: Alternative approaches to Effective Reform

Research examined how alternative approaches to reform, such as new accountability policies, whole school reform approaches, and efforts to contract out instructional services, address issues of coherence, incentives, and capacity.

2001-Present: How Reform Links to Instructional Improvement

To be effective, reform must directly improve instruction as instructional improvement is the key to increased student learning. Building upon previous research, the Center for Policy Studies researchers examine how reform links to instruction improvement.